Войти Добавить текст
Вы здесь:
------ Страница 5 ------

Лечение неизлеч.(В.Коновалова) - Страница 5

medicine has proved

helpless. Such ailments include psoriasis, eczema, allergies, bronchial

asthma, prostatite, ischemic heart disease, encephalopathies, grave

anemias, neurosis, peptic ulcer, menТs impotency, infertility, womenТs

masthopathies and myomas, etc.

Instead of Уhealth-oriented medicineФ official medicine has become

Уdisease-oriented medicineФ. Instead of putting man in good health, it only

removes pain and suppresses development of a disease - this is essentially

its goal and this is what its capabilities boil down to.

Regretfully, years of this approach to health have led to a situation in

modern medicine in which the emphasis is not on the doctorТs skills but on

instruments and the pharmaceutical industry, to manТs being actually

divided up between narrow specialists. The crisis of modern medicine as

disease-oriented medicine certainly does not diminish its achievements, nor

does it mean negation of narrow specialisation. But, preservation of the

METHODS and Technology of official medicine as they are today leads to a

deadlock.

What do we get as a result? Because we have no Уhealth-oriented medicine

we suffer from diseases. We can and must be healthy and sound. The answer

lies in an integral system medicine.

An integral approach is essentially a combination of everything best in

diagnostics and treatment methods in traditional (old Chinese, Indian),

non-traditional (modern) medicine and certain folk healing approaches. How

do we get as a result? Because we have no "health-oriented medicine we

suffer from diseases. We can and must be healthy and sound. The answer lies

in an integral system medicine.

An integral approach is essentially a combination of everything best in

diagnostics and treatment methods in traditional (old Chinese, Indian),

non-traditional (modern) medicine and certain folk healing approaches. How

do we switch to integral medicine? It`s not so easy as it seems. A mere sum

of means and methods- swallowing a pill and an herbals preparation,

followed by two or three Herbal teas and self-suggestion- is not enough for

good health. This is not what is meant by integral, or system medicine.

What is crucial is not subtraction but interaction of all sorts of

medicine. Human health depends not only on absence or presence of

diseases, but on harmony between the body, spirit and consciousness,

absence or presence of finer-than-disease disturbances- hereditary

weakness of organs, dysfunction, pre- and post- illness conditions. A

combination of fine disturbances undermines the health of man. This is why

methods of traditional medicine help to reveal and remove hidden multiple

disturbances. Modern medicine practically cannot do that, because its

diagnostic arsenal is always directed towards revealing and correcting

diseases alone.

Thus, traditional and non- traditional medicines look at human health

from contradicting each other, they organically combine and are integrated

from both a diagnostic and treatment standpoint.

Integration of traditional and non- traditional medicines is not a goal

approach of diagnostics and treatment.

Looking at man his health from different aspects and different provides a

three- dimensional picture as a complex and cognisable system. Only such a

systematic approach allows individualisation, prediction and a disease-

prevention trend in medicine, treatment of man instead of disease, of the

root cause instead of the consequences. Only such an approach makes it

possible to understand that everybody has his own cause for any disease- a

cause for allergy and psoriasis, ischemic heart disease, polyarthritis,

paradontosis, prostatite, balding, bronchial asthma.

Physicians, who have long been talking of an individual approach, will

be indignant. What is an individual approach as they understand it?

Take for comparison s sake two allergic cases. At any allergy centre a

patient will be taken through allergic tests to determine his or her own

individual set of allergens. Then an anti- allergy preparation will be

chosen which suppresses the allergy in this particular person, in a dose

which corresponds to this person s age. Then he Сll take a course of

hyposensibilisation to the discovered allergen. And then doctors will tell

the patients to avoid contact with his specific allergens- this is what is

called an individual approach.

Put yourself in the shoes of patients. All of them go on living with

their allergies, which as a rule develop into polyallergies. Allergens are

encountered at about every step and cannot be avoided. Mind you that anti-

allergic preparations are not harmless.

What is a truly individual approach and system of disease prevention?

Above all, it has to be found out why this particular patient is allergic

to what thousands of other people are not? Many will object to this and

say that that s the problem and this is just what modern medicine cannot

do. In this article I mean to say that such opportunities exist, but they

cannot be translated into reality within the old four corners of the old

way of thinking.

I mean to say that diagnostics should be carried out in a way which permits

the discovery of ailments and finer disturbances. Then a set of these

disturbances should be analysed from the positions of system clinical

thinking and conclusions drawn on the hidden complex

Навигация:

Страница 7
Страница 6
-- Страница 5 --
Страница 4
Страница 3